Walworth line

The Walworth name was not decorative. It was an ancestral name carried forward through the Pattison household.

Walworth linePublished genealogy

Published genealogy / 1962

Walworth line

The Walworth name was not decorative. It was an ancestral name carried forward through the Pattison household.

Where this page comes from Walworth-Walsworth Genealogy, 1689-1962, 1962

Why it changes the telling The Walworth name was not decorative. It was an ancestral name carried forward through the Pattison household.

How far it carries us It is a published genealogy, not a civil certificate. Use it for orientation while still seeking vital records.

Open the full source Open the public scan

Clean reading copy

Walworth-Walsworth Genealogy, 1689-1962

WALWORTH-WALSWORTH GENEALOGY, 1689-1962

Public reading note prepared from the local proof ledger.

This printed genealogy is used in the family tree for two jobs. First, it gives the upward Pattison-Walworth line: Thomas P. Walworth Pattison is carried as a child of Abraham K. Pattison and Elizabeth Ann Walworth. Second, it helps extend Charles Edward Pattison's branch by naming Charles Edward Pattison Jr. and Marie Pattison.

For family reading, the important point is the name pattern. Walworth was not an ornamental middle name. It was a family surname that reappears as a given name in the Pattison line.

What it proves for the public tree: Thomas P. Walworth Pattison belongs in the Pattison-Walworth line. Charles Edward Pattison Jr. and Marie Pattison belong in the Charles branch.

What it does not finish: It is a printed genealogy, not a civil certificate. Birth, marriage, and death records should still be pulled for each event when the branch is expanded further.